UMD Patient Consent in Healthcare Lessons from Burchells Case Research Paper

you must find a case that is still ongoing today with at least 10 calls from both sides. Defendant in the prosecutor. The case must be somehow involved in healthcare or medical field.

Here is a rubric to know what is expected of for the paper.

Make sure the paper includes:

a. Is the paper formatted properly (APA, MLA, etc.)?

b. Does it contain all required sections?

1. Title page

2. Transmittal Letter

3. Table of Contents

4. Abstract

5. Executive Summary

6. Ethical Issues

7. Case Study

a. Background

b. Allegations

c. Defense

d. Verdict

8. Proposal

9. Feasibility Study

10. Summary

11. Appendices

a. Organizational Chart

b. Timeline

c. Logical Fallacies (Claimant)

d. Logical Fallacies (Defense)

e. (Original)

12. References

Abstract

ii. 250-300 word discussion of the key elements of each portion of your paper

c. Executive Summary

i. What is this study

ii. Why was it done

iii. Types of research (primary, secondary)

iv. Findings

v. Actions to be taken (emphasize this section)

d. Ethics

i. (At least 1.5 pages)

ii. General Ethical Principles

iii. Ethics in this particular field of endeavor

iv. Transitional mention of case as an exemplar of (at least) one specific ethical constraint

e. Introduction of the Conflict

i. Neutral, unbiased “road map” of your paper.

ii. Begin with a broad consideration of general principles, which may include

1. Historical perspectives

2. The general area under consideration

3. The “issue”

a. Principles (reference Organizational Chart)

b. Case particulars (refence Timeline)

c. Allegations (reference Complainant Logical Fallacies Chart)

d. Defense (reference Defendant Logical Fallacies Chart)

e. Verdict

f. Proposal

i. Minimal, if any, punitive measures. The objective is to minimize the probability of a recurrence.

ii. Failings of current laws, or ability to implement them.

iii. Other proposals under consideration

iv. Your proposal

1. Succinct statement of the problem (you’ve already detailed it in previous sections)

2. Technical proposal

3. Business proposal

4. Timeline for implementation

v. Throughout, be as detailed as possible.

1. How well does the work provide evidence of critical thinking? What areas might be further explored?

2. What additional systemic changes that would be needed to truly make a difference could the author explore?

vi. Feasibility study

1. What impediments to change exist that bear further exploration?

2. How can this proposal surmount those issues?

3. (It’s expected that your answer to the basic question, “Should we proceed with this proposal?” would be a definitive “Yes.”

vii. Summary

1. Synopsis of the problem and solution

2. Link the case back to the particular ethical issue.

3. Does the author offer a synopsis of his or her findings and discuss them with respect to core ethical issues?

viii. About 10 pages, Times New Roman 12pt font, double spaced