STU Hormonal Havoc Alternative Therapies to Hormone Replacement Discussion Ques

Question Description

Describe your clinical experience for this week.

Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they?
Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), assessment, plan of care, and possible differential diagnosis.
What did you learn from this week’s clinical experience that can beneficial for you as an advanced practice nurse?
Support your plan of care with the current peer-reviewed research guideline.

Submission Instructions:

Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.
You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.)
All replies must be constructive and include at least two references.

null

Grading Rubric

Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

Discussion Rubric
Criteria	Ratings	Points
Identification of Main Issues, Problems, and Concepts	5 points Distinguished Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts.	4 points Excellent Identifies and demonstrates an accomplished understanding of most of the issues, problems, and concepts.	2 points Fair Identifies and demonstrates an acceptable understanding of most of the issues, problems, and concepts.	1 point Poor Identifies and demonstrates an unacceptable understanding of most issues, problems, and concepts.	5 points
Use of Citations, Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines	3 points Distinguished Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing. High level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.	2 points Excellent Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. Moderate level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.	1 point Fair Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.	0 point Poor Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.	3 points
Response to Posts of Peers	2 points Distinguished The student constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal to each.	1 point Fair The student constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal.	0 point Poor The student provided no response to a peer’s post.	2 points

Discussion Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Points

Identification of Main Issues, Problems, and Concepts

5 points
Distinguished

Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts.

4 points
Excellent

Identifies and demonstrates an accomplished understanding of most of the issues, problems, and concepts.

2 points
Fair

Identifies and demonstrates an acceptable understanding of most of the issues, problems, and concepts.

1 point
Poor

Identifies and demonstrates an unacceptable understanding of most issues, problems, and concepts.

5 points

Use of Citations, Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines

3 points
Distinguished

Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing. High level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.

2 points
Excellent

Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. Moderate level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.

1 point
Fair

Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.

0 point
Poor

Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.

3 points

Response to Posts of Peers

2 points
Distinguished

The student constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal to each.

1 point
Fair

The student constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal.

0 point
Poor

The student provided no response to a peer’s post.

2 points

^{"Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you "A" results."}