Northern Virginia College Berger & Eisenberg Evidence and Reasoning Discussion

Question Description

This assignment is due on or before the date found in the Calendar.

Answer the following question in 100 words or less.

Youre sitting in a restaurant enjoying a meal when two men at a nearby table start fighting. Well, it really isnt a fight but more of an argument. Well, it really isnt an argument but more of a discussion. Okay, you were eavesdropping but for good reason. At the nearby table sits Charles (Chuck) Berger and Eric Eisenberg. Chuck tells Eric that people communicate to reduce uncertainty (or manage it) while Eric tells Chuck that people have a need to be strategically ambiguous when communicating. Your job is to resolve the issue by (1) using evidence and reasoning to show that you understand both theories by defining them while (2) offering your perspective of what makes the most sense based on the two theories, and (3) provide a real example from your life experiences that proves that your perspective is makes sense.

http://www.questia.com/library/journal/1G1-1952718…

https://oregonstate.edu/instruct/theory/ur.html

^{"Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you "A" results."}