Select Page

San Diego State University The Movie The Caine Mutiny Essay

Question Description

Dear students

Please watch the movie The Caine Mutiny (1954) directed by Edward Dmytryk. I would suggest taking notes while you watch it. You can find the questions to guide you on the next page, but you are not limited to them. You are free to emphasize any other important point you observe in the movie. You are going to write an essay with introduction, main body and conclusion sections and incorporate the questions into your essay.

The paper will be double-spaced, font size 12, minimum 4 pages. You are not required to cite additional sources. You are expected to present the content, critically analyze it and reflect on the new information you gained while connecting the issues to the broader themes of course. It is essential that your paper is well-organized and written in professional language that applies the grammar and spelling rules. Over 40% of similarity based on the Turnitin report will be considered plagiarism and you will be reported. Submission must be either in DOC, DOCX or PDF formats for Canvas to accept it.

You can find the link to the documentary in the Module 6 folder. It is titled “Movie for Writing Assignment-2”. You will be required to log in with your SDSU email account and password since the movie is provided by an online database through the Library. You can switch on subtitles by clicking on the three dots icon in the video interface. You can find the link to the documentary below:

https://digitalcampus.swankmp.net/sdsu301489/watch/3B79394C41D48FFA?referrer=direct (Links to an external site.)

Good luck

  • Captain de Vries: “This one is tired. She’s had the guts run out of her, or we’d have it molt down for razorblades. The crew may not look like much, they are tired too, but every man is OK. (27:40)” What did Captain de Vries try to tell the new captain? (please think about the leadership theories and followers)
  • Lieutenant Commander Philip Francis Queeg: “I’ve had seven tough years in the Atlantic. Believe you me, the last two were mighty interesting. When those subs [submarines] ganged up on us, I thought they had it on me personally. (30:30)” Do you think Captain Queeg’s previous deployment/position might have a negative impact on his psychology?
  • Does the captain get carried away sometimes? How does he cover up the mistake of cutting the towline by circling around? Does he admit mistakes or blame the others? Why does not he want his ship to be the last ship arriving Pearl Harbor after the exercise? (35:20).
  • What happens when the USS Caine assists the landing craft to the beach? Does the captain’s behavior change under stress? Why does Lieutenant Steve Maryk, the executive officer, argue with the captain? How do the officers and crew interpret the captain’s behavior? (51:00)
  • Does Captain Quegg try to gain the respect of his officers and make peace in the wardroom meeting? Why does he fail? Do the officers trust him? How does Lieutenant Keefer, the communications officer, explain captain’s mental status? (55:54)
  • Can people be led only by relying on position power and fear?
  • Considering the Managerial Grid theory, how can you define Captain Queeg’s leadership?
  • How does Lt. Maryk’s opinion on the captain’s mental health change?
  • What happens on the night of the typhoon? Is the captain able to give orders?
  • What is Captain Queeg’s problem? What happens at the courtroom?

Rubric

Writing Assignments

Writing Assignments

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComprehensive and accurate content review

25.0 to >20.0 pts

Excellent

The documentary was presented thoroughly, accurately and persuasive manner in the paper.

20.0 to >14.0 pts

Good

Some key points either missing or glossed over unnecessarily.

14.0 to >7.0 pts

Fair

Either some material was not covered or was covered inaccurately or superficially.

7.0 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

Key points were not covered or were covered in a totally inaccurate manner.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical analysis and reflection on useful knowledge

25.0 to >20.0 pts

Excellent

Thoughtful, critical analysis of the assigned documentary offered in the paper and details on key issues are provided.

20.0 to >14.0 pts

Good

Analysis advanced key ideas but did so sporadically or inconsistently; some details are missing from the analysis.

14.0 to >7.0 pts

Fair

Analysis included some key ideas but failed to reflect most of them and either the details are not included or inaccurate

7.0 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

The paper largely failed to grasp key issues and lacked any details or critical approach.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImplications drawn, tied to the broader themes of course

25.0 to >20.0 pts

Excellent

Implications explored were realistic and thoughtful. Made insightful connections between assigned material, key theoretical concepts, broader course themes.

20.0 to >14.0 pts

Good

Some effort made to identify implications of material, but teasing out their importance to course, theories, and concepts could be better.

14.0 to >7.0 pts

Fair

Some effort made to identify implications of material, but teasing out their importance to course, theories, and concepts is incomplete.

7.0 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

The paper largely failed to identify key implications and little or no effort made to link findings with broader themes/concepts.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics

25.0 to >20.0 pts

Excellent

Excellent writing of paper; organization of paper; use of concise, clear language; use of professional language is evident.

20.0 to >14.0 pts

Good

Good writing of paper; organization of paper; use of concise, clear language; use of professional language is evident.

14.0 to >7.0 pts

Fair

Some evidence of good writing of paper; organization of paper; use of concise, clear language; use of professional language is intermittent.

7.0 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

Little if any evidence of good writing of paper; organization of paper; use of concise, clear language; lack of use of professional language.

25.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0

1000 words please

"Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you "A" results."

Order Solution Now