SDSU 1974 Estes & Palmisano Food Web Anthropogenic & Keystone Species Discussion

Answer the question provided below using the papers attached below

Estes and Palmisano (1974), Estes et al. (1998) – Questions for Discussion

1. Define a “keystone species”. (1pt)
2. Explain how the orca-otter-urchin-kelp food web presented in these studies is an example of top-down control. (1pt)
3. Define “anthropogenic”. What anthropogenic effect is most responsible for the situation with the sea otters? (1pt)
4. Find and describe another example of a keystone predator creating top-down controls in an ecosystem. Include the predator species, the ecosystem, and how the ecosystem would be different in the absence of the predator species. (2pt)
5. Estes and Palmisano 1974, Figure 1: What is this graph comparing? Why is there no line shown for vegetation at Shemya Island (hint: what does “coincident with the ordinate” mean)? (2pt)
6. Estes and Palmisano 1974, Figure 2: Based on this graph, describe the difference in sea urchin size demographics between the two islands. Why are these differences important? (2pt)
7. Why are kelp forests ecologically important? What ecosystem services do they provide to other species living in the region? What benefits can they provide to human societies? (3pt)
8. Keystone species are often the focus of conservation efforts. Describe at least one benefit of this approach to conservation, as well as one potential risk or limitation to this approach. (3pt)
9. Describe a potential strategy for bringing these kelp forest ecosystems back into balance. What might be a limitation or difficulty with implementing this strategy? (3pt)
10. Write out the citations for both papers using Ecology formatting. (2pts)