New York Institute of Technology Business and Law Questions
Question Description
Question I – Kansas passes a statutes which says all corn must be grown and processed in a certain manner so as to avoid harmful pesticides. This statute is challenged as being unconstitutional. What are the two factors for the court to consider when deciding whether the statute is constitutional?
Question II – Downtown Cincinnati, in an area known as Over the Rhine, has long been an area of poverty containing empty and rundown buildings. The city of Cincinnati wishes to use this area to create new businesses and spark economic development. Would the eminent domain power allow the city to take this property from the building owners for the purpose of economic rejuvenation and elimination of blight within the city? What U.S. Supreme Court case would serve as precedent for this issue?
Question III – Two (2) high ranking managers of Anrun Corp. know that the companys revenue is rapidly declining. However, at a recent shareholder meeting, they tell the shareholders to expect record profits in the next quarter. Explain the three Blanchard and Peale questions that these two managers should have asked themselves before the shareholders meeting.
Question IV – The appellate court decides that the trial court committed reversible error by including evidence found by law enforcement. Law enforcement discovered this evidence when committing a Fourth Amendment violation, which should have been excluded at trial. This inadmissible evidence was the lynchpin of the prosecutors case, which resulted in a conviction. Where does the case go from here? Is the Defendant free to go? Does it go back to the trial court? Does it go all the way up to the Supreme Court?
Question V – Lonnie dies while working on a barge. Lonnies widow sues the barge company in state court. The Parties agree on the facts and cause of Lonnies death; however, they do not agree whether the Longshoreman Act should apply to this case. Lonnies widow has already received a remedy in a separate administrative action as part of a workers compensation claim. The Longshoreman Act would allow the decedents family to pursue an action in court, even if the family has agreed to a settlement as part of the workers compensation action. If the Longshoreman Act does not apply, then the decedents family will have no remedy in court. Prior to trial, what motion should the barge companys attorney make? What must this attorney prove in order for her motion to be successful?
Note : post should be in APA format (including Times New Roman with font size 12 and double spaced)
Refer to this texbook :Jennings, M. M. (2017). Business: Its Legal, Ethical, and Global Environment (11th ed.). Cengage Learning
"Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you "A" results."