The University of Texas at Austin Human Communication Question

Question Description

I’m working on a communications report and need support to help me understand better.

Description:

For this assignment you will identify and explain the concepts of self-awareness, self-esteem and perception in order to gain a better understanding of each as well as increase your perceptual accuracy.

Objective:

Define self-concept, self-awareness and self-esteem, how they are related, and explain the ways in which self-awareness and self-esteem may be increased.
Define perception and its stages, and explain how to increase perceptual accuracy.

Instructions:

Review concepts related to self-awareness, including The Four Selves, that you explored in the textbook and in the learning activities.
Consider the fact that an individual’s self-awareness combined with an individual’s perception of a situation often varies and differences in both can influence how a communication interaction transpires.
Reflect on a time when you encountered different perceptions of an event or interaction.
Address differences in your understanding of yourself in relation to another’s understanding of yourself.
Write a 3-4 page essay that describes the event, differences of perception and defines the concepts of self-awareness and perception .

Assignment Submission:

The use of outside resources is strongly recommended, and all papers must be cited and written in current APA format.
When you have completed the assignment, select the “Submit Assignment” button at the top of these instructions and choose a format for submitting your assignment.

Rubric

Assignment Rubric – Universal (1)

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdeas

10 pts

Ideas are clear, insightful, thought provoking, and focused; they consistently support the solution to the assignment challenge or question(s).

8 pts

Ideas are clear and focused to support the solution to the assignment challenge or question(s), but they are not consistently insightful or thought provoking.

6 pts

Ideas are clear but conventional or general; they only somewhat support the solution to the assignment challenge or question(s).

2 pts

Ideas are unclear or clichéd and demonstrate a lack of focus in support of the solution to the assignment challenge or question(s).

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication

10 pts

The assignment includes clear connections to lesson content. It includes abundant details and examples that generate interest and provide relevant, concrete, and insightful evidence in support of sound logic.

8 pts

The assignment includes most of the established criteria to the lesson content. It presents fairly well-reasoned details with examples that generate some relevant, concrete, and insightful evidence in support of sound logic.

6 pts

The assignment includes minimal or confusing connections to lesson content. Detail and examples are included but are general and not interesting. The assignment lacks evidence in support of sound logic.

2 pts

Connections to lesson content are not included. The assignment is insufficient, providing scarce or inappropriate details, evidence, and examples that might include logical fallacies.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent and Support

10 pts

Content meets or exceeds established assignment criteria. The assignment clearly presents well-reasoned notions and concepts. All content is well-supported with scholarly resources. Assertions are consistent with selected research.

8 pts

Content meets almost all of the established assignment criteria. The assignment presents fairly well-reasoned notions and concepts. All content is adequately supported with scholarly resources. Assertions are mostly consistent with selected research.

6 pts

Content is missing several important requirements of the established assignment criteria. The assignment presents notions and concepts that are only somewhat applicable. Some content is supported with scholarly resources. A few assertions are consistent with selected research.

2 pts

Content does not meet established assignment criteria and is missing most of the important requirements. The assignment presents poorly reasoned notions and concepts. Content is not supported with scholarly resources. Assertions are inconsistent with selected research.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization

10 pts

The assignment is focused in an organized and thoughtful manner. Content is constructed in a logical way that supports the solution to the challenge or question(s).

8 pts

The assignment is organized, but the focus could be more precise. Content is constructed in a way that mostly supports the solution or question(s).

6 pts

The assignment is lacking focus and is unorganized. Content is constructed in a way that loosely supports the solution or question(s).

2 pts

The assignment is unfocused and unorganized. Information shows no effort to support the solution to the challenge or question(s).

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat and Citations

10 pts

Format is correct, meets all assignment directions, and works expertly to support the purpose of the assignment. There are no grammar, capitalization, punctuation, or spelling errors. The correct number and type of citations are included and follow current APA format with no errors.

8 pts

Format is correct, meets most of the assignment directions, and works to support the purpose of the presentation. There are no more than three grammar, capitalization, punctuation, or spelling errors. The correct number and type of citations are included and follow current APA format with no more than two errors.

6 pts

Format is somewhat correct, meets some aspects of assignment directions, and works generally to support the purpose of the presentation. There are four to six grammar, capitalization, punctuation, or spelling errors. Citations are included, but some are missing, or the type is not appropriate. There are three to five errors in current APA format.

2 pts

Format is faulty, does not meet sufficient aspects of the assignment directions, and does not support the purpose of the presentation. There are more than seven grammar, capitalization, punctuation, or spelling errors. Citations are not included, and if APA formatting is evident, it contains more than six errors.

10 pts

Total Points: 50

^{"Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you "A" results."}