STU Wk 2 Urinary Tract Infection Causes Symptoms Diagnosis & MGT Clinical Discussion

Weekly Clinical Experience 2

Describe your clinical experience for this week. patient came to the clinic complaining of weight gain, vaginal bleeding for 18 days, fatigue and weakness. Diagnosis with Polycist Ovariun

• Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they?
• Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), assessment, plan of care, and possible differential diagnosis.
• What did you learn from this week’s clinical experience that can beneficial for you as an advanced practice nurse?
• Support your plan of care with the current peer-reviewed research guideline.

Submission Instructions:

• Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Grading Rubric
  

  ---

  Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

  Discussion Rubric
  Criteria	Ratings	Points
  Identification of Main Issues, Problems, and Concepts	5 points DistinguishedIdentify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts.	4 points ExcellentIdentifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.	2 points FairIdentifies and demonstrate an acceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.	1 points PoorIdentifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.	5 points
  Use of Citations, Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines	3 points DistinguishedEffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing. High level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.	2 points ExcellentEffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. Moderate level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.	1 point FairIneffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.	0 point PoorIneffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.	3 points
  Response to Posts of Peers	2 points DistinguishedStudent constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal to each.	1 points FairStudent constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal.	0 point PoorStudent provided no response to a peer’s post.