San Diego State University Structuralism and Mythology Philosophy Discussion

I’m working on a philosophy multi-part question and need a sample draft to help me learn.

answer the questions based on the video:

Think overall about the consequences of the development of structuralism in the hands of Barthes?
What makes communication and signs so complicated as it relates to the multiple layers of signifieds lying in a signifier?
How might one relate Barthes claims about mythology to critical theory?
How psychological is Barthes view about meaning intention (say, in the example of news-broadcasts or news scrolls/fonts or soap)?
What is the point of mythologizing or mystifying?
What is the importance of mythology converting history or current events into nature (or essence or essentialism)?
If we cannot get rid of mythology can we really demystify it?
What is the relation between semiology and ideology and mythology?
What is Barthes NOT doing according to the podcast? Put positively, what is he uncovering?
How does semiotics turn into a psychologized hermeneutic of demystification in the hands of Barthes? To what end do we engage in structural semiotic analysis?

^{"Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you "A" results."}