San Diego State University Structuralism and Mythology Philosophy Discussion
Question Description
I’m working on a philosophy multi-part question and need a sample draft to help me learn.
answer the questions based on the video:
- Think overall about the consequences of the development of structuralism in the hands of Barthes?
- What makes communication and signs so complicated as it relates to the multiple layers of signifieds lying in a signifier?
- How might one relate Barthes claims about mythology to critical theory?
- How psychological is Barthes view about meaning intention (say, in the example of news-broadcasts or news scrolls/fonts or soap)?
- What is the point of mythologizing or mystifying?
- What is the importance of mythology converting history or current events into nature (or essence or essentialism)?
- If we cannot get rid of mythology can we really demystify it?
- What is the relation between semiology and ideology and mythology?
- What is Barthes NOT doing according to the podcast? Put positively, what is he uncovering?
- How does semiotics turn into a psychologized hermeneutic of demystification in the hands of Barthes? To what end do we engage in structural semiotic analysis?
"Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you "A" results."