BSC 2010 FIU Effect of Temperature on Amylase Activity Essay

) Introduction Section This section should indicate why the study was done and give the reader sufficient background to understand the report. The “why” of the study willinclude historical information that leads to your study and the significance of the study toa specific discipline (such as developmental neurobiology) to which the study belongs. The reader, after perusing the introduction, should know precisely the importance of the problem being addressed. You should write about the questions you will be answering in this experiment. Although, the content of the introduction should start broadand narrow in scope as the introduction proceeds,be careful not to start too broad.This could lead to problemswith the scope of the paper.Note: any historical background (that is, previous studies) must be properly cited. This section must include 4 peer reviewed outside sources (outside of lab book and text book), of which 2 should be primary literature. This section contains the basic background information for the lab report. Be sure to comment on what is the significance of this study and its relation to the larger field. Give an example of why the study is significant. Your hypothesis is usedto make the prediction(s). The predictions are based on the background information that was gathered. You should have a clear statement of the reason for performing the lab along with including the rationale for each technique used. •What was the purpose of each experiment? For each experiment, include questions that will be answered and the expected predictions of the results for each question. Try to include a hypothesis. (without saying “My predictions are…” or “My hypothesis is…”)•Note: Just because you are writing a report about a lab exercise does not mean you are basing the entire report on one hypothesis. You are more than likely going to need to discuss more than one set of variables, which would lead to more than one hypothesis or prediction. •This section should be between450–700 words long and smoothly flow from one topic to the next.

(6) Discussion

Section In brief, the Discussion section is where results are interpretedand conclusions are drawn. The significanceand interpretation of the study should be explained in this section. Specific points made in the Results section should be discussed in light of previous studies and hypotheses.This means there needs to be cited literature in this section.Often, new hypotheses are put forth, based on the experimental outcome. This may be included in your discussion. The most important part of the Discussion section is establishing what the results indicate, both for the ongoing study and for future studies. For each point made in the results, you need to discuss why things happened the way they did. If there were errors made, then this needs to be included and in context with the interpretation of the results. Were the questions you included in the Introduction section, answered by this study? If not, how could the study be redesigned? Some questions that can be answered in interpreting the results in the Discussions section are: Why are these results the same as (or different from) previouslypublished studies? What parameters of the experimental design were important in the expected (or unexpected) results? Are some of the results due to artifacts? How do you know? How might the experimental design be altered to diminish artifacts? What are limitations of the experimental design? Why are these results important in a broader context?•This section should be approximately500–700 words long. •Thissection should include a clear discussion in relation to each hypothesisand/or prediction and should discuss what is known about the topic (reported by other researchers).