Aveda Institute New York English Learning Language Discussion Questions

I’m working on a research & summaries multi-part question and need a sample draft to help me understand better.

PLEASE SEND THEM BACK ON SEPARATE PAGES in the same document……..

QUESTION 1(PAGE ONE 250 WORDS)

Which of the following areas of professional development would be most beneficial for the teachers at your school – language development, English as a Second Language (ESL) instructional strategies, or sociocultural inclusion? How could professional development in the chosen area benefit ELLs learning of language and content?

QUESTION 2(PAGE ONE 250 WORDS)

What possible obstacles may prevent teachers from participating in professional development opportunities? How can teachers overcome these obstacles? What support systems could enable a teacher to be successful?

POSSIBLE RESOURCES

-Read “Seven Elements of Effective Professional Development,” by Bates and Morgan, from The Reading Teacher (2018).(attached)

-Read “Beyond Compliance: ESL Faculty’s Perspectives on Preparing General Faculty for ESL Infusion,” by deJong, Naranjo, Li, and Ouzia, from Educational Forum (2018).(attached)

-Read “Effective Professional Development for Teachers to Foster Students’ Academic Language Proficiency Across the Curriculum: A Systematic Review,” by Kalinowski, Gronostaj, and Vock, from AERA Open (2019). URL: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1210497.pdf

RUBRIC:

Presents a thorough description of an actual conference that includes a convincing description of its purpose. Creative and insightful reasons are provided that correlate to higher learning outcomes for ELLs.

Provides explicit examples of relevant legislation, policies, and standards regarding educating ELLs that are related to their teaching and the conference.

Provides specific and extensive examples of how attending the PD would benefit both ESL and general education teachers.

Provides an extensive and realistic plan toward implementation, listing resources and innovative teaching strategies that would lead to higher educational outcomes for ELLs.

Provides at least two more insightful resources of additional relevant information that increases the persuasive tone and improves chances for approval.

In-text citations and References page are complete and error-free. Sources are credible and appropriate for the submission. The sources strongly support the submission.

The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.

Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.