MVCC Quality Improvement of Health Information Management Report Essay
Question Description
Hello, this should be in apa format, in text citation included. Fully detailed (please follow the rubric)- paper should be formatted as is. So A1, A2 and etc should have own section and be labeled.
A. Write a report to the director of health information management (HIM) that analyzes current quality improvement initiatives at Fielder Medical Center by doing the following:
1. Summarize three quality improvement initiatives at Fielder Medical Center and justify why the initiatives are necessary to the center.
2. Evaluate whether each of the three quality improvement initiatives at Fielder Medical Center comply with their internal organizational processes.
3. Evaluate whether Fielder Medical Centers three quality improvement initiatives comply with applicable standards established by federal external agencies.
4. Evaluate how Fielder Medical Centers three quality improvement initiatives are in compliance with the necessary federal and state legal requirements.
B. Discuss how HIM professionals play a significant role in the quality and patient safety initiatives at Western View Hospital.
C. Acknowledge sources, using APA-formatted in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
RUBRIC
NOT EVIDENT A summary of 3 quality improvement initiatives at Fielder Medical Center is not provided. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE Three quality improvement initiatives at Fielder Medical Center are not summarized accurately, or the justifications for these quality improvement initiatives are illogical. |
COMPETENT Three quality improvement initiatives at Fielder Medical Center are accurately summarized. The justifications for the quality improvement initiatives are logical and well supported. |
NOT EVIDENT An evaluation is not provided. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The evaluation does not address whether each of the 3 quality improvement initiatives complies with internal organizational processes. The evaluation is irrelevant or illogical. |
COMPETENT The evaluation addresses whether each of the 3 quality improvement initiatives complies with internal organizational processes. The evaluation is relevant and logical. |
NOT EVIDENT An evaluation is not provided. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The evaluation does not identify federal external agencies and does not use their established standards to support whether each of Fielder Medical Centers 3 quality improvement initiatives is in compliance. |
COMPETENT The evaluation identifies federal external agencies and uses their established standards to support whether each of Fielder Medical Centers 3 quality improvement initiatives is in compliance. |
NOT EVIDENT An evaluation is not provided. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The evaluation does not identify what the necessary federal and state requirements are, or does not explain whether each of Fielder Medical Centers 3 quality improvement initiatives is in compliance with the necessary legal requirements. |
COMPETENT The evaluation identifies what the necessary federal and state requirements are, and explains how each of Fielder Medical Centers 3 quality improvement initiatives is in compliance with the necessary legal requirements. |
NOT EVIDENT A discussion is not provided, or the discussion makes no reference to how HIM professionals play a significant role in quality and patient safety initiatives at Western View Hospital. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The discussion does not address how HIM professionals play a significant role in quality and patient safety initiatives at Western View Hospital. |
COMPETENT The discussion addresses how HIM professionals play a significant role in quality and patient safety initiatives at Western View Hospital. |
NOT EVIDENT The submission does not include in-text citations and references according to APA style for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The submission includes in-text citations and references for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized but does not demonstrate a consistent application of APA style. |
COMPETENT The submission includes in-text citations and references for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and demonstrates a consistent application of APA style. |
NOT EVIDENT Content is unstructured, is disjointed, or contains pervasive errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar. Vocabulary or tone is unprofessional or distracts from the topic. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE Content is poorly organized, is difficult to follow, or contains errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar that cause confusion. Terminology is misused or ineffective. |
COMPETENT Content reflects attention to detail, is organized, and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively conveys the intended meaning. Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate interpretation and understanding. |
"Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you "A" results."
