ERAU Texas Fuel Release and Remediation Against Chemicals and Fuels Essay

Question Description

Hazardous Chemical Release and Remediation – Fuel Spills and Responses

In manufacturing operations, chemicals and fuels are used on a constant basis. Some manufacturing facilities have an on-site petroleum fueling station to fuel up the facilitys transport vehicles. Fueling tanker trucks fill the above-ground tanks (ASTs) storing the fuel. There is a potential for a large release of fuel onto the ground during this loading operation. There could be several causes for this fuel release: faulty connections, over-filling, pipe rupture, etc. The facility has less than 500 total gallons of fuel on the property, and as such, the facility is not required to have an SPCC plan.

Consider that there is a large release of fuel (about 100 gallons) to the ground during an AST filling operation. The spill is currently localized to company property only, and has not reached any stream or waterway.

In your state, country, or region (I live in Texas)

1. does the spill need to be reported to any federal, state, or other agency?

2. What conditions trigger reporting in such cases?

3. Given your state or regional process, what steps should be taken to study the fuel release?

4. What are the important parameters to be determined about the fuel release such that remediation can be implemented effectively? (Note, for this assignment, we are not proposing nor performing the actual remediation.

4a) We are collecting appropriate information so that remediation can be designed and performed).

Paper should be in APA 7 formate; including a title page and a reference page. An abstract is not required for this assignment. The body of your paper (not including title or reference page) should be approximately 2-3 pages.

Your paper will automatically be evaluated through Turnitin when you submit your assignment in this activity.

Rubric

SFTY 580 6.3 Writing Assignment Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeObjectives (accomplishes goals and objectives of assignment and completes assignment requirements)

30.0 pts

Superior 28-30 | Submission thoroughly addresses all aspects of the assignment requirements.

27.0 pts

Excellent 25-27 | Submission meets most aspects of the assignment requirements.

24.0 pts

Good 21-24 | Submission meets some of the assignment requirements.

20.0 pts

Fair 17-20 | Submission minimally meets assignment requirements.

16.0 pts

Poor 0-16 | Submission fails to meet assigned requirements and does not address goals and objectives of the assignment.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch (consider scholarly literature for sources of data and references)

20.0 pts

Superior 19-20 | Submission provides excellent evidence of a meaningful scholarly research effort.

18.0 pts

Excellent 17-18 | Submission provides significant evidence of a meaningful scholarly research effort.

16.0 pts

Good 15-16 | Submission provides logical evidence of a meaningful scholarly research effort.

14.0 pts

Fair 13-14 | Submission provides minimal evidence of a meaningful scholarly research effort.

12.0 pts

Poor 0-12 | Submission fails to provide, or does not show evidence of a meaningful scholarly research effort.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thought (consider evaluation of previous research and data and demonstrates critical thinking)

20.0 pts

Superior 19-20 | Submission thoroughly demonstrates the application of critical thought that support project conclusions.

18.0 pts

Excellent 17-18 | Submission significantly demonstrates the application of critical thought that support project conclusions.

16.0 pts

Good 15-16 | Submission logically demonstrates the application of critical thought that support project conclusions.

14.0 pts

Fair 13-14 | Submission minimally demonstrates the application of critical thought that support project conclusions.

12.0 pts

Poor 0-12 | Submission fails to demonstrate the application of critical thought that support Submission conclusions.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Punctuation, and Writing Style

15.0 pts

Superior 14-15 | All aspects of the submission illustrates correct grammar, punctuation, and writing style.

13.0 pts

Excellent 12-13 | Most of the submission shows correct grammar, punctuation, and writing style.

11.0 pts

Good 10-11 | Some or most of the Submission shows correct grammar, punctuation, and writing style.

9.0 pts

Fair 7-9 | Some of the Submission shows correct grammar, punctuation, and writing style.

6.0 pts

Poor 0-6 | Submission fails to meet, or does not display correct use of grammar, punctuation, and writing style.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA format

15.0 pts

Superior 14-15 | Submission exhibits excellent compliance with proper APA format.

13.0 pts

Excellent 12-13 | Submission exhibits significant compliance with proper APA format.

11.0 pts

Good 10-11 | Submission exhibits some compliance with proper APA format.

9.0 pts

Fair 7-9 | Submission exhibits minimal compliance with proper APA format.

6.0 pts

Poor 0-6 | Submission fails to present or does not follow a proper APA format.

15.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0

^{"Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you "A" results."}