Colorado State University Global Campus Amazon Privacy Issues Paper
Question Description
For this Portfolio Project, you will compose an informal report for a stakeholder at an international company or nonprofit organization. The informal report can be directed to an internal or external stakeholder. Use research to determine the name and title of the person for whom you will be writing the report.
The final project must contain the following sections:
- Introduction (no header)
- Audience Analysis (level 1 header)
- Problem/Background (level 1 header)
- Purpose for Report (level 2 header)
- Relevance to Stakeholder (level 2 header)
- Proposed Solution(s) (level 1 header)
- Solution to Problem (level 2 header)
- Benefit to Solution (level 2 header)
- Counterargument (level 1 header)
- Recommendation/Actions (level 1 header)
- Final Report/Email (1 page) (level 1 header)
- Conclusion (level 1 header)
- References
- Appendix (with supporting evidence)
Requirements:
Your paper should be 6-8 pages in length not counting the title page, references, and appendix which you must include. The paper must conform to the CSU Global Writing Center (Links to an external site.) guidelines. Include at least four scholarly sources and four professional publications as references in addition to the course textbooks, and your sources should be no more than 5 years old. The CSU Global Library is a good place to find these references. Refer to the Portfolio Project rubric for grading criteria. See this link (Links to an external site.) for a sample informal report email template. Refer to the Portfolio Project rubric for grading criteria.
COM300 Mod 8 PP
COM300 Mod 8 PP
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements
|
| 50.0 to >40.0 pts
Meets Expectation
The Portfolio includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
40.0 to >30.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
The Portfolio includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
30.0 to >20.0 pts
Below Expectation
The Portfolio includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
20.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
The Portfolio includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
|
50.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
|
| 50.0 to >40.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of writing an effective report/email for a business purpose; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.
|
40.0 to >30.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
|
30.0 to >20.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
|
20.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.
|
|
50.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources
|
| 50.0 to >40.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Cites and integrates at least eight credible sources.
|
40.0 to >30.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Cites and integrates seven credible sources.
|
30.0 to >20.0 pts
Below Expectation
Cites and integrates six credible sources.
|
20.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Cites and integrates fewer than six credible sources.
|
|
50.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis
|
| 50.0 to >40.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the research regarding the problem, solution, and stakeholder for the report.
|
40.0 to >30.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant, but not major, errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.
|
30.0 to >20.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.
|
20.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.
|
|
50.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication of Source Material
|
| 50.0 to >40.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Sources well or adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue; knowledge from the course linked properly to source material.
|
40.0 to >30.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major problems with selection and linkage of sources.
|
30.0 to >20.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major problems with selection and linkage of sources.
|
20.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Source selection is seriously flawed; no linkage to knowledge from the course.
|
|
50.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
|
| 10.0 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format, including an introduction, body, and conclusion. Conforms to project requirements.
|
8.0 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Small number of significant but not major flaws in organization and writing; follows proper format. In a minor way does not conform to project requirements.
|
6.0 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major problems in organization and writing; does not completely follow proper format. In a significant way does not conform to project requirements.
|
4.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Project is not well organized or well written and does not follow proper format. Does not conform to project requirements.
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Style
|
| 20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few or no minor errors in grammar and spelling; appropriate writing style; clear and concise with no unsupported comments.
|
16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Small number of significant but not major errors in grammar and spelling; generally appropriate writing.
|
12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; work needed on grammar and spelling; does not meet program expectations.
|
8.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Poor quality; unacceptable in terms of grammar and/or spelling; inappropriate writing style that interferes with clarity.
|
|
20.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style
|
| 20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU Global resources on APA citation style, with no more than one significant error.
|
16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global resources on APA citation style, with no more than two to three significant errors.
|
12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global resources on APA citation style, with four to five significant errors.
|
8.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global resources on APA citation style, with more than five significant errors.
|
|
20.0 pts
|
|
Total Points: 300.0
|
"Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you "A" results."
