Select Page

UWO Spur Industries Inc v Del E Webb Development Co Law & Economics Case Study

Question Description

Please answer the questions below after reading Spur Industries, Inc. v.Del E. Webb Development Co. (The brevity of answers would be preferred.)

a. What remedy was decided by the trial court?

b. What remedy was decided by the appeal court?

c. What is the meaning of “coming to the nuisance”?

d. Suppose that the case against Spur had been dismissed on “coming to the nuisance”grounds. And suppose that Spur had remained where they were and had continued tooperate a cattle feedlot. Now suppose that ten years later, the Surgeon General of theUnited State has announced that persistent exposure to odor and flies is carcinogenic.Several of the residents of Sun City have developed cancer during that ten-year periodand can make a plausible claim that the nearby cattle feedlots are responsible.

Use the economic theory of remedies to suggest how a new suit by the residents againstSpur can most efficiently be resolved.

"Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you "A" results."

Order Solution Now