UMKC ?Police Brutality Social Issue Amy Sherald Artist Response Paper
Question Description
Response Paper 3 (20 points)
Objective:
Identify a social issue that is important to you, and research an artist, or artwork that addresses that issue.
Learning objectives:
Connecting an artist or artwork to a social issue that is current.
Expectations:
No more than two pages, double spaced (12 pt. font).
____________________________
Prompt 1: Describe the issue that is important to you, and how you chose an artist who addresses that.
Prompt 2: Describe the artist’s work and how it addresses the issue you chose to focus on.
Prompt 3: Describe how the artist helped you understand the issue important to you, through their art work.
You must address all three prompts, and be specific.
This response paper will be graded by the GTA for the course.
Live Performance Analysis Rubric F20
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
|
| 5.0 pts
Full Credit
The response is easy to read with clear organization of thoughts and examples. Student’s response was easy to read, followed a logical flow and the organization of the paper supported the points the student was articulating.
|
3.0 pts
Partial Credit
Flow of the paper was somewhat jumbled and difficult to follow.
|
0.0 pts
No Credit
The organization of thoughts are hard to follow. Organization of the paper and ideas was not clear.
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyle and Mechanics
|
| 5.0 pts
Full Credit
The response consistently uses proper punctuation, grammar, and spelling.
|
3.0 pts
Partial Credit
The response contains fewer than 4 errors in punctuation, grammar, and spelling.
|
0.0 pts
No Credit
Essay contains 5 or more errors in punctuation, grammar, and spelling.
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
|
| 10.0 pts
Full Credit
The response completely answers the prompts. Examples are specific and concrete, and supports the main thought.
|
7.0 pts
Most Credit
The response somewhat answers the prompts; some information is missing. There are some examples that are specific and concrete.
|
4.0 pts
Some Credit
The response contains too much non-related information that distracts from the focus; examples are nonspecific and/or abstract and do not all support the main thought.
|
0.0 pts
No Credit
The response does not answer any of the assigned prompts; examples are vague and unrelated, or do not support the main thought.
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
Total Points: 20.0
|
"Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you "A" results."
