St Thomas University Chronic Kidney Disease Analysis Case Study

Question Description

Goal:

Design a study guide that will assist you and your peers to translate relevant clinical guidelines and evidence-based research into evidence-based practice to promote health and prevent chronic health problems.

You must choose one of the conditions below:

- - Diabetes Mellitus,
  - Congestive Heart Failure,
  - Chronic Kidney Disease or
  - COPD.

Your study guide must include:

- - Definition, etiology
  - Occurrence/epidemiology
  - Clinical presentation
  - Diagnostic testing
  - Differential diagnosis
  - Non-pharmacological and pharmacological management and follow up

Submission Instructions:

The study guide is to be clear and concise and will provide a quick reference for a specific chronic disease.
Include your resources and guidelines used for the elaboration of the study guide.
Please use the attached template below to completed your assignment.
- Guide for a Selected Chronic ConditionTemplate.docx
Students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation, misspelling, and references should be current (published within the last five years).

Grading Rubric

Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

Essay/Paper Rubric
Criteria	Ratings	Points
Identification of Main Issues/Problems	4 points Distinguished Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.	3 points Excellent Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.	2 points Fair Identifies and demonstrate an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.	1 point Poor Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.	4 points
Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Problems	4 points Distinguished Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.	3 points Excellent Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.	2 points Fair Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.	1 point Poor Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.	4 points
Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding	4 points Distinguished Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.	3 points Excellent Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.	2 points Fair Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.	1 point Poor Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.	4 points
Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature	4 points Distinguished Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.	3 points Excellent Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.	2 points Fair Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.	1 point Poor Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.	4 points
Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines	4 points Distinguished Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.	3 points Excellent Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.	2 points Fair Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.	1 point Poor Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.	4 points
Total Points: 20

Essay/Paper Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Points

Identification of Main Issues/Problems

4 points
Distinguished

Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.

3 points
Excellent

Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.

2 points
Fair

Identifies and demonstrate an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.

1 point
Poor

Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.

4 points

Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Problems

4 points
Distinguished

Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

3 points
Excellent

Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.

2 points
Fair

Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

1 point
Poor

Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

4 points

Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding

4 points
Distinguished

Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.

3 points
Excellent

Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

2 points
Fair

Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

1 point
Poor

Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

4 points

Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature

4 points
Distinguished

Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.

3 points
Excellent

Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.

2 points
Fair

Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.

1 point
Poor

Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.

4 points

Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines

4 points
Distinguished

Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.

3 points
Excellent

Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.

2 points
Fair

Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.

1 point
Poor

Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.

4 points

Total Points: 20

El siguiente contenido está proporcionado por un socio

^{"Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you "A" results."}