New York University Week 1 The People vs Ledesma Case Study

The case of People v. Ledesma, 729 P.2d 839, 871 (Cal. 1987) is posted under Week 1’s Required Resources. After reviewing Ledesma, answer the following questions:

1. What were the facts of Ledesma? (150 words)? (1/4 pt.)
2. What was the decision of the California court in Ladesma? (150 words) (1/4 pt.)
3. Why is this case important with respect to the ethical duties of attorneys to their clients? (1/4 pt.)
4. Are these same duties shared by paralegals? (150 words) (1/4 pt.)

For best outcomes, please consult the following checklist before, during, and after preparation of your Case Study:

• Did you review the “Case Study Grading Rubric” before, during, and after the preparation of your submission?
• Did you properly cite your sources from the eText and/or any other relevant source in preparation your work? [Any submission that does not cite sources will receive -0- points].
• If citing to the eText as a source, did you cite the specific page number(s)?
• Did you include the word count of your submission at the end of your work?
• Did you prepare your work in your own words? [Copying and pasting from the eText or any other source is not permitted.]
• If quoting from the eText or any other sources, did you limit your quoting to only include one (1) direct quotation from that source? [No more than one quote is permitted.
• Did you proofread your work before submission? [In addition to substance and critical analysis, your assignment will be graded for writing, grammar, spelling, punctuation, etc.]

https://nyulaw.libguides.com/index.php

https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1228080/peop…

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/legal_research