Moraine Valley Community College Four Electronic Health Record Functions Paper
Question Description
Answering the following questions in full detail. For example: A, A1, A2 should all have their own section.
Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. An originality report is provided when you submit your task that can be used as a guide.
You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.
A. List four electronic health record (EHR) functions needed by clinical end-users in the acute care setting.
1. Describe how each EHR function listed in part A may be used.
2. Discuss one strategy that might be used when introducing new technology to enable it to integrate with old technology in the acute care setting.
B. List three EHR functions needed by clinical end-users in the outpatient setting.
1. Explain how each EHR function listed in part B is used.
C. Compare two models being used today in health information exchanges.
1. Describe benefits to developing health information exchanges.
2. Describe current challenges preventing more widespread implementation of health information exchanges.
D. Explain three factors an organization should consider when providing a personal health record to patients.
1. Discuss three qualities of a personal health record that should be determined before its adoption.
E. Acknowledge sources, using APA-formatted in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
F. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.
RUBRIC
NOT EVIDENT A list of 4 electronic health record (EHR) functions needed by clinical end-users in the acute care setting is not provided. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The list of 4 electronic health record (EHR) functions needed by clinical end-users in the acute care setting is inaccurate. |
COMPETENT The list of 4 electronic health record (EHR) functions needed by clinical end-users in the acute care setting is accurate. |
A1. USE OF ACUTE CARE FUNCTIONS:
NOT EVIDENT A description is not provided. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The description is not logical or poorly supports how each EHR function may be used by clinical end-users in the acute care setting. |
COMPETENT The description is logical and supports how each EHR function may be used by clinical end-users in the acute care setting. |
A2. INTRODUCING NEW TECHNOLOGY:
NOT EVIDENT A discussion is not provided. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The discussion of 1 strategy that might be used when introducing new technology to enable it to integrate with old technology in the acute care setting is illogical or inaccurate. |
COMPETENT The discussion of 1 strategy that might be used when introducing new technology to enable it to integrate with old technology in the acute care setting is logical and accurate. |
NOT EVIDENT A list of 3 EHR functions needed by clinical end-users in the outpatient setting is not provided. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The list of 3 EHR functions needed by clinical end-users in the outpatient setting is not accurate. |
COMPETENT The list of 3 EHR functions needed by clinical end-users in the outpatient setting is accurate. |
B1. OUTPATIENT APPLICATION USE:
NOT EVIDENT An explanation is not provided. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The explanation is illogical or poorly supports how each EHR function is used by clinical end-users in the outpatient setting. |
COMPETENT The explanation is logical and supports how each EHR function is used by clinical end-users in the outpatient setting. |
NOT EVIDENT A comparison is not provided. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The comparison of 2 models being used today in health information exchanges is not accurate or is poorly supported. |
COMPETENT The comparison of 2 models being used today in health information exchanges is accurate and well supported. |
NOT EVIDENT A description is not provided. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The description of the benefits to developing health information exchanges is irrelevant or does not explain why health information exchanges are beneficial |
COMPETENT The description of the benefits to developing health information exchanges is relevant and explains why health information exchanges are beneficial. |
NOT EVIDENT A description is not provided. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The description of current challenges preventing more widespread implementation of health information exchanges is illogical or irrelevant. |
COMPETENT The description of current challenges preventing more widespread implementation of health information exchanges is logical and relevant. |
NOT EVIDENT An explanation is not provided. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The explanation does not include 3 relevant factors an organization should consider when providing a personal health record to patients, or does not explain why these 3 factors are relevant. |
COMPETENT The explanation includes 3 relevant factors an organization should consider when providing a personal health record to patients, and explains why these 3 factors are relevant. |
NOT EVIDENT A discussion is not provided. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The discussion does not identify 3 qualities of a personal health record or does not explain why these 3 qualities should be determined before the records adoption. |
COMPETENT The discussion identifies 3 qualities of a personal health record and logically explains why these 3 qualities should be determined before the records adoption. |
NOT EVIDENT The submission does not include in-text citations and references according to APA style for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The submission includes in-text citations and references for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized but does not demonstrate a consistent application of APA style. |
COMPETENT The submission includes in-text citations and references for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and demonstrates a consistent application of APA style. |
F. PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION:
NOT EVIDENT Content is unstructured, is disjointed, or contains pervasive errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar. Vocabulary or tone is unprofessional or distracts from the topic. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE Content is poorly organized, is difficult to follow, or contains errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar that cause confusion. Terminology is misused or ineffective. |
COMPETENT Content reflects attention to detail, is organized, and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively conveys the intended meaning. Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate interpretation and understanding. |
"Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you "A" results."
