FIU Language Barrier in Health Care Facility Research Paper
Question Description
Assignment #1 Rubrics
You are the Chief Nursing Officer (CNO) at a local hospital in an area that is experiencing an influx of immigrants from different countries. Your leadership team is encountering the conflict of a language barrier, as the workforce is not the same as this patient population. You may experience staff and patient complaints.
- As a CNO, you must prepare a report for the board of hospital executives with recommendations for a plan of action. (offer a $2,000 sign in bonus for bilingual staff in order to attract culturally diverse nurses and offer interpreter services phone line)(may add any other idea of your own)
- The objective of this research project is to prepare the nursing leader to analyze and discuss the best possible plan to address this issue.
- Examine the types of cultural competence conflict that you may experience when providing culturally competent care and nursing recommendations to resolve these conflicts.
- Develop a strategic plan that measures progress, foster the magnet principles and promote patient safety in the Hospital
- Support effective decision-making as part of a healthy work environment 6. Apply one MSN essential interventions to support your plan. (use master Essential III: Quality Improvement and Safety)
*Support this paper with at least two to three journals from within the last 5 years.
This assignment is 20% of the grade. No late assignment will be accepted if there is no extenuating circumstances. It is required a maximum of a 4 page-paper in length with an abstract of no more than 250 words is required. (5 pages total)
|
Introduction: Alignment of Topic to Research Project (10%) |
It is consistent with application in research related to its context. Clarity of ideas |
The topic is partially appropriate for research with fair clarity of ideas. |
The topic has a weak association to clarity of ideas and research topic. |
Does not meet criteria |
|
Quality of Analysis of argument in the Introduction (10%) |
Argument in projects introduction is precise, concrete, clearly addressed |
Argument is not consistently clearly addressed. |
Argument is not clearly stated. |
Does Not meet Criteria |
|
Quality of the Body and content (20%) |
Consistent quality and clarity of content |
Inconsistent quality and clarity of content |
Lack of clarity and clarity of content |
Does not meet Criteria |
|
Quality of the Literature review (20%) |
Thorough evidence supporting topic with peer |
Content is inconsistently thorough. Average evidence |
Content is vague. Poor evidence for arguments. Literature is not |
Does Not meet Criteria |
|
reviewed journals within the last 5 years. |
in literature review supporting arguments with peer reviewed journals within the last 5 years. |
within the last 5 years. |
|
Mechanics Objectivity of Tone (20%) |
Writer uses Standard American English that is edited. Objective & appropriate Tone, Language & Diction appropriate. |
Same as proficient but with less than 5 % of minor mistakes. The tone is not consistently professional and objectively. |
Same as other two areas, but with major mistakes in grammar, language & spelling. The tone is not consistently objective. |
Does not meet criteria |
|
Advance Practice Nursing Implications including MSN essential (10%) |
Consistent clarity and thorough in details content |
Inconsistent clarity and details in content |
Lack of clarity and details in content |
Does not Meet Criteria |
|
APA Format (10% |
Excellent APA 6thformatting |
Few errors in APA 6th formatting |
Many errors in APA 6th formatting. |
Does Not Meet Criteria (too many APA errors) |
"Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you "A" results."
