Select Page

Excelsior College Negative Predictive Value Public Health Document Review

Question Description

You learned the basics of outbreak investigation in Module 1, and additional measures of disease occurrence and approaches to measuring and monitoring disease frequency in this module. Consider how descriptive epidemiology and surveillance are important and useful tools to identify and track trends in disease occurrence, and the basic measures of disease frequency that are used. Remember, epidemiologists count! They ‘count’ in that they make a difference in the world of public health. They also literally count because they measure disease frequency – and then interpret. Think about how visualizing data is an important aspect of this process.

In a MS Word or similar document, with each question numbered, respond to each of the questions below.

Disease Status

Screening Status

Sick

Healthy

Total

Positive

78

792

870

Negative

22

9,108

9,130

Total

100

9,900

10,000

1. Using these data (above), calculate the following and interpret the results in a sentence.

  1. Sensitivity
  2. False Negative Rate
  3. Specificity
  4. False Positive Rate
  5. Positive Predictive Value
  6. Negative Predictive Value
  7. Prevalence of Disease

Disease Status

Screening Status

Sick

Healthy

Total

Positive

640

1,400

2,040

Negative

360

7,600

7,960

Total

1,000

9,000

10,000

2. Using these data (above), calculate the following and interpret the results in a sentence.

  1. Sensitivity
  2. False Negative Rate
  3. Specificity
  4. False Positive Rate
  5. Positive Predictive Value
  6. Negative Predictive Value
  7. Prevalence of Disease

3. Based on your answers to # 1 and # 2, which of the two tests is the most accurate? Why? Which of the two tests performs better, that is, yields the greatest proportion of cases in the population screened? Why?

4.Which test, A or B, would you rather have as a screen for HIV in the U.S. population? Why? Would your answer be the same in a different population? Why or why not?

5. A study was conducted examining a new test for determining carpal tunnel syndrome. Due to the repetitive work that auto assembly line workers face when assembling cars, these workers were recruited into the study. The new test examines nerve conduction (NC) to determine carpal tunnel syndrome. NC screens were performed on 1,200 workers. 650 had symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome. Of these, 523 had abnormalities on NC tests consistent with carpal tunnel syndrome. Of those without symptoms, 187 had abnormalities consistent with the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Assuming that the symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome are the gold standard for diagnosis, construct a 2×2 table and answer the following:

  1. Calculate and interpret the sensitivity of the NC test.
  2. Calculate the true prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome.
  3. Your initial study was a multi-center trial in North America. You want to know how the test will perform in Japan, where the prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome is lower compared to the North American population. What happens to the positive predictive value of your test when you re-run the study in Japan?

Compose your work in a .doc or .docx file type using a word processor (such as Microsoft Word, etc .) and save it frequently to your computer. For those assignments that are not written essays and require uploading images or PowerPoint slides, please follow uploading guidelines provided by your instructor.

Check your work and correct any spelling or grammatical errors. When you are ready to submit your work, click “Submit Assignment” in the upper right corner. Click on “Browse,” browse your computer, and select your file. Click “Open” and verify the correct file name has appeared next to the Browse button. Enter your comments, if any, in the Comments area. Click on “Submit Assignment.”

"Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you "A" results."

Order Solution Now