CSULA Addressing Emerging Threats in Cyber Security Article Review Discussion

Question Description

The intuition behind the paper reviews is to look at existing scientific research and critique what has been done. This will enable you to appreciate what has been done and identify how that work can be improved or extended. I have also provided a short article on reviewing scientific papers to assist you.

For the subsequent paper reviews and presentations, you can use the CTI product or platform to compliment your findings on how the research in the provided readings can be extended. This is because cyber threat intelligence continues to evolve as new threat actors and techniques continue to change the attack landscape.

All the paper reviews should be 2 papers long and to avoid plagiarism, you have to critique the paper in your words based on how you understood it. Below is the rubric for the paper reviews and presentations.

#	A. Grading Elements for Paper Review	Points
1	Paper Review structure	5
2	Research Problem, Research question(s), Hypotheses and methodology	5
3	Dataset Description and Sampling Techniques	5
4	Explanation of Results, Analysis and Ground Truth	10
5	Generalizability of results/models and research contributions	10
6	Research limitations	5
7	Identification of research gap(s)	5
8	Well written critique (no spelling or grammatical errors, have a storyboard)	5
9	Coherent and clear writing	5
10	Can the paper be extended? Provide suggestions, How about future work?	5
	Total points	60

^{"Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you "A" results."}